But even if you don't care about that, it still seems like a strict downgrade in functionality. The privacy implications are still worse in that situation, because you no longer have a choice not to log into Chrome. If you have sync turned on in that scenario, you are going to end up with bookmarks and passwords that randomly disappear depending on who was logged into what when they were added.Īnd sure, you can get around that by just not using sync. Anecdotally, that is relatively common for older generations sometimes they'll even ask each other to check their email if a computer isn't nearby. MAILPLANE LINK OPENS BROWSER BUT NOT THE PAGE HOW TOEven with syncing passwords - both of my parents know how to log into each other's Gmail accounts. Caring about that doesn't mean you will necessarily care about hiding search history from your partner. The privacy implications here are in regards to stuff like Google stripping search terms off of urls from competing services. It is not implausible to me that you'd want to have separate emails, but also want all of your bookmarks to sync across multiple devices regardless of who they belong to. My parents share computer accounts heck, they even share bank accounts. So they've made the unethical choice, and made this an opt-out feature. They want to gather more data on their users, and know if their users were stopped and prompted to think about whether or not they actually wanted this convenience, they would have less participating users. The fact that they made this browser/Google Account sync the default was no accident. But the ethical thing for Google to do would be to make this an opt-in feature, rather than an opt-out. Granting as few permissions as possible for applications we use, and avoiding using a single identity across all of our devices is a good way to mitigate that risk.Īre you an individual that is willing to reduce your privacy a bit for added convenience? That's perfectly fine. That being the case, we need to adopt certain heuristics to help defend our privacy. I, as an individual, can't fully assess the privacy impact of every single piece of technology I use, and what seems to be a benign feature backed by a corporation I trust could be anything but. You could point out reasons why this isn't the same thing, but you'd be missing the point. People similarly dismissed concerns about information Facebook was sharing with third party apps that seemed to just provide quick entertainment like "the which celebrity are you most like quiz!" Years later, it turned out to be part of a massive data-mining operation meant to get information about voters. Set the flag to disabled with a click on the menu and selecting disabled from the context menu.Ĭhrome breaks the link between the Google account in Chrome used to sync data and Google accounts that you sign in using the browser on Google sites." Google Chrome should display the flag Identity consistency between browser and cookie jar at the top.Ģ. Load chrome://flags/#account-consistency in the browser's address bar. As long as it turns up when you run the steps below it is supported.ġ. Note: Google may remove experimental flags like the one described below at any time. Doing to breaks the link between the Google Account in Chrome that is used to sync data and Google accounts on Internet sites. Good news is that it is possible currently to disable the feature. If yes, you'll be signed out of Chrome when you signed out of Gmail account. >This is an intended behaviour if you are using the same Google Account for your Gmail and Chrome. "Google calls the feature "Identity consistency between browser and cookie jar" and a Chrome representative on the official Google Chrome Help Forum confirmed that this is the intended behavior.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |